NOAM stands
for Noar Masorti, or Masorti Youth.
Masorti is the name of the Conservative Movement outside of North
America. I learned about Masorti in
Israel during the Israel Today Seminar, and I guess I understood that there was
something like it in other countries, but I had never really thought about it
before this weekend.
The bus came
to pick us up Friday morning and took us (8 from Kfar, 6 from Karmiel, 1 from
Yerucham, and 12 from Jerusalem but originally from Argentina, Brazil, and
Chile [all but one spoke English very well]) to a water park in Tiberius. Here, we N Ams barely talked with the S
Ams. We played some bad ice breakers,
ate, and talked. Some of us went down
the water slides and swam, too. A little
before leaving, I started talking with a few of the NOAM people, and Dana,
Becca, and I decided we should split up our amazing room to be with them.
We went to a
hotel on the Kineret a little south of Tiberius. I ended up rooming with Clarice and Daniela
from Brazil and Becca. After settling
into our room and preparing for Shabbat (side note: the NOAM Shabbat dress code
is much more casual than that of Nativ), we met with everyone again. Representatives from each country gave a
presentation on their youth movements (NOAM, NOAM, NOAM, and USY; it’s also
NOAM in the UK, France, Australia, and other countries). It’s interesting that USY is just for high
school and the pre-high school programs are not as popular, and NOAM usually
starts around 2nd grade (age 3 in Chile!). They use a lot of Hebrew terms in NOAM, my
favorite of which is tznif (chapter).
(It’s my favorite especially when paired with “shnat,” as in Shnat NOAM
[NOAM year, the gap year program name].
Get it? Tznif and shnat. Sniff and snot! Heehee.)
In 10th grade, NOAM participants become madrichim
(counselors, guides) for the younger kids, and they can do this into their
20s. The purpose of Shnat NOAM is for
participants to come back to their countries and be better NOAM madrichim. I also found it interesting that democracy is
a strong value in NOAM because it is completely taken for granted in USY.
Then it was
Shabbat. We lit candles and rejoined for
services. 2 NOAMers from Argentina led
Kab Shab, and 2 NOAMers from Chile led maariv.
Both pairs used tunes new to me, some of which I absolutely loved.
After
dinner, we had an oneg (joy [of]) Shabbat.
In NOAM, this means games! It was
a lot of fun. As Nativ, we planned on
leading a tisch, but this was not the right mood for sitting and singing.
Before going
to sleep we hung out together. I ended
spending most of this time talking about Jewish beliefs and Jewish life in my
room with Daniela. I’m amazed at how
easy it was to have a conversation about my personal religious beliefs to
someone I had known for only a few hours.
Finally, we went to sleep around 2.
I woke up
early in the morning and went for a “walk.”
There was nowhere to walk, so I actually spent most of this time just
looking out at the water and at the Jordanian mountains on the other side. Absolutely serene.
Services
were not until 10, which is almost a full Shabbat morning service time after
when we usually start. Deena led psukei
dzimra (beginning section of morning services).
Then I did something I haven’t done in months…years?...and led
shacharit. I had to use my non-favorite
tunes because those are the ones I know best, but I think it went well. Jacob (Karmiel madrich) led musaf (additional
service at the end of Shabbat and holiday morning services). After lunch and some free time, Maddy led
mincha.
We had
programming for most of the afternoon.
For the first program, we split into groups of 4 and were given many
(maybe 25?) strips of paper with potential ideals/pillars of Jewish youth
movements. In our small groups we had to
prioritize 5 ideals for what we think would create the greatest youth
movement. I was grouped with one other
Nativer (Elie), an Israeli who works for NOAM, and an Argentinean. This program was extremely interesting: by
arguing over values, we learned the differences between NOAM and youth
movements in the US. My group eventually
decided on (top 5 in no particular order) Masorti Judaism (partly because it incorporates
halacha [law]), Zionism (something I personally probably would not have chosen,
but much easier to accept than another option, “encouraging aliyah”), tikkun
olam (repairing the world, refers to community service, social action, etc.),
hadracha (guiding, but only for young ages; for high school age we prefer peer
leadership), and one other that I cannot remember at the time. The only pillar that was chosen by each group
was tikkun olam.
In the next
program, we looked at pictures of Jewish practices and had to decide whether we
thought each was acceptable by Masorti and whether we personally accepted
them. There was a wide range on the
conservative-liberal scale: one picture was of a synagogue with a gallery for
women, another of a woman reading Torah, another of homosexual men receiving
smicha (rabbinical ordination). It turns
out that all of the pictures were from Masorti/Conservative communities, and
all are accepted. It is not that the
movement is wishy-washy, but two contradicting practices may both be acceptable
if there is a strong argument for a halachic basis.
For the
final program, 2 people were given scenarios of modern “hot topics” and had to
debate different sides of issues such as women wearing tallitot, using a phone
on Shabbat, and intermarriage. Whoever
was not debating could tag in to switch places with a debater. Probably not surprising, but I did a fair
amount of debating. At the end, one of
the coordinators asked if there were other hot topics we’d have liked to
discuss. Responses included ‘the gay
issues,’ Kohen-Levi-Yisraeli hierarchy, and religion if only one’s father is
Jewish.
We ate
dinner, packed, and met again for maariv and havdallah. Then, it was time to board the buses (only
now, because of locations, we were to be separated by programs. The Shabbaton was too short, and the final
month of Nativ is not enough time to see the NOAM people much more. How did we become friends so quickly? Most Nativers honestly felt close with at
least a couple NOAM people after just a day.
I didn’t feel close to any Nativers on the 2nd day of
Nativ! Is it because of the South
American culture? (When we were saying
goodbye, I learned they are all great huggers.)
Is it because we’re mamash the same people? I guess it doesn’t matter why. We plan on meeting again one night during
Nativ’s last week in Jerusalem, and I hope to keep in touch with a few
people. It was an incredible weekend.
Trivia: The
most commonly played songs by Nativers for the past couple weeks are “Call Me
Maybe” and “Somebody that I Used to Know.”
No comments:
Post a Comment